Alhaji Abubakar Atiku the Presidential candidate of the People’s Democratic Party, PDP, in February 25, 2023, general election has said that the national electoral body the Independent National Electoral Commission, INEC, is
meddlesome interloper in its defence of Bola Ahmed Tinubu on his qualifications for the election.
Atiku specifically accused the national electoral body of being busy body and fishing in another person’s troubled water.
The petitioner made the accusation through his lead counsel Chief Chris Uche SAN while responding to an application filed by the national electoral body praying the court to dismiss some of the allegations against Tinubu in his petition.
INEC through its counsel at Friday’s proceedings, Mr Kemi Pinhero SAN had moved a motion on notice praying the Court to strike out some of the allegations made against Tinubu by Atiku in his petition.
The electoral body pleaded with the Court to strike out 32 allegations made against Tinubu by Atiku in the petition challenging the declaration of Tinubu as the winner of the February 25 Presidential election.
INEC said that the allegations which formed 32 paragraphs in the Atiku’s petition should be discountenanced by the Court for various reasons comprising lack of jurisdiction.
But Atiku through his lead counsel, Chief Chris Uche SAN filed counter affidavit in opposition to INEC’S request and asked the Court to dismiss the electoral body’s position.
Uche argued in the counter affidavit that it was not the duty of INEC to do the battle or argue the case of Tinubu who is 2nd defendant in the petition.
Specifically, Atiku’s lead counsel insisted that INEC ought to be neutral but somersaulted by turning itself to busy body and meddlesome interloper by taking up the defense of Tinubu against the provisions of the law.
He therefore asked the Court to dismiss INEC’S motion for being gross abuse of court process, lacking in merit and grossly incompetent.
Meanwhile, the Chairman of the Court, Justice Haruna Simon Tsammani has fixed ruling till the date of judgment in the substantive petition.